IMO Proposal Calculator

The IMO Proposal Calculator compares how four Member State proposals for the IMO Net-Zero Framework, submitted as circular letters, would change compliance costs for a shipping company under four illustrative compliance strategies, from 2030 to 2040.

Four IMO proposals in the tool

  • NZF As-is (Australia, Canada, South Africa, UK — CL.5216): The IMO NZF as approved at MEPC 83 modified to start 2029.

  • NZF Softer Start (Brazil — CL.5214): Eases near-term targets, but converges on the NZF path in 2040s.

  • NZF Enhanced Pricing (Tuvalu — CL.5215): Creates a pure tax on emissions up to Tier 2 and removes trading.

  • Market-defined GFS (Liberia — CL.5213): Ties GHG trajectory to commercially available fuels, with no Fund or GHG pricing.

Four compliance strategies users to configure and compare

  • Strategy 1 — VLSFO + bio-diesel: fossil fuel oil, and blend bio-diesel or use Remedial Units to meet targets.

  • Strategy 2 — LNG + bio-methane: switch to LNG, and blend bio-methane or pay the Remedial Units to meet targets.

  • Strategy 3 — VLSFO + ZNZ: fossil fuel oil, and use zero- or near-zero energy (ZNZ) to meet targets.

  • Strategy 4 — 100% ZNZ: fully ZNZ and sell surplus compliance credits.


The IMO Proposal Calculator is a comparison tool driven by your organization’s assumptions, not a price forecast. Default fuel prices are drawn from the IMO's Comprehensive Impact Assessment on the global fleet for transparency and comparability with the wider IMO analysis; you can replace them with your own. The tool will be updated as decisions are made on the IMO NZF and details become clearer. 

Note: Our Concept Paper refers to a previous version of the IMO NZF Calculator, but the concepts are also applicable to the new IMO Proposals.


Disclaimer

Outputs are illustrative model results based on user-supplied assumptions – not forecasts, benchmarks, recommendations, or legal/financial advice. Users must make independent commercial decisions. The scenarios reflect a range of possible outcomes under different assumptions. No scenario represents the Center's expectation, recommendation, or forecast. Users must select and adjust assumptions to reflect their own commercial circumstances.

Feedback or suggestions for future editions? Reach out: